Select Page


The Successful Launch of Relationship Compatibility 2.0 in Milan

Last night in Milan, a crowded presentation marked the debut of Relationship Compatibility Score 2.0. Chiara Barbaro, owner and our gracious host, successfully shared her enthusiasm for this latest “jewel” with the many attendees—a tool that honors true Astrology in contrast to mere “horoscopy.”

Dear friends joined us from all over Italy—Campania, Puglia, Piedmont, Trentino, and beyond. The questions were many, and the audience participation was far from ordinary. The topic was incredibly intriguing; someone even predicted that by the time we present Compatibility Score 3.0 in a few years, even the ghosts of “Astrologies” improperly considered our “cousins” will be in attendance.

For us, the evening went exceptionally well; it was a joy to see and embrace so many dear friends once again. A special mention goes to the venue, Après Coup, a true Milanese treasure I hadn’t visited before, but one I intend to frequent, starting with the hospitality of the owner. The audience was highly qualified, consisting of people who have followed our work for decades and with whom we share a bond of mutual affection and esteem.

As of last night, the Relationship Compatibility Score 2.0 site is live and, as always, free to use at the usual address: https://www.myastral.org/pages/affinitycouple

Until next time…


Chronicle of the Event and the Algorithm’s Numbers

Yesterday afternoon, Chiara Barbaro, owner of MyAstral.org, announced the details of this important launch. Curated by myself and created exclusively for MyAstral.org, the 2.0 score is now operational following the official presentation held in Milan on January 8, 2026, at the Après Coup library-café.

Elective Affinity and Compatibility Score 2.0: A Bit of History

This is a much-debated topic that often sees astrologers from different schools on opposing sides. I must admit that I have had a serious methodological rethink on this subject in recent years, and I am not ashamed of it. In 1978, in Guida all’astrologia (Armenia ed.), I wrote that signs at 90 degrees should never unite; I was even more categorical then, stating that school children should be taught never to partner with someone born three months before or after them.

Later, extensive case studies forced me to face reality: couples with signs in quadrature (square) were actually the most numerous among those married or cohabiting for many years. I discussed this with esteemed colleagues, particularly my friend Lisa Morpurgo. She confirmed finding the same reality in her archives and encouraged me to conduct statistical research on a large sample to prove it.

Together with Luigi Miele, I conducted research published in Ricerca ‘90 (January 1991), analyzing 2,116 couples (4,232 subjects) from the Gauquelin archives. The results showed that couples with the Sun in square or opposition were by far the most frequent. Today, I am absolutely convinced that the square and opposition of natal Suns are the most important “certification” of a solid, long-term relationship. Another widely accepted factor is the conjunction of one partner’s Sun with the other’s Moon. Unions characterized by a trine (e.g., Libra with Gemini) proved much less significant.

The Scoring Rules (The 2.0 Evolution)

Together with Luigi Miele, we developed a system to assign a “grade” to each couple based on tradition, personal experience, and statistical data. The rules are:

  • +8 points if Sun A is square or opposite Sun B (+11 points if within 2 degrees).

  • +8 points if Sun A is conjunct Moon B (or vice versa); (+11 points if within 2 degrees).

  • +4 points for any aspect linking the Sun, Ascendant, or Moon of A with the Sun, Ascendant, or Moon of B (+8 points if within 2 degrees).

  • +5 points for “Signs of Destiny” (the same sign, the opposite, or those at 90 degrees). Note: If a specific square or opposition is already counted, these 5 points are not added to avoid double-counting.

  • +4 points for an aspect between Venus A and Mars B (or vice versa), as the Venus-Mars draw remains crucial in synastry.

Reference Benchmarks:

  • 0–5: Non-existent relationship.

  • 5–10: Mediocre.

  • 10–15: Important.

  • 15–20: Very important.

  • 20+: Exceptional. (Note: While the new algorithm allows for much higher scores, 20 remains a threshold for excellence).

Why the Change?

Over the last two years, we decided to apply the “Rule 34” logic to natal charts: aspects with very tight orbs (under 2 degrees) carry immense weight. For example, my wife Daniela and I both have the Moon at the 10th degree (mine in Sagittarius, hers in Gemini). Under the old system, which didn’t sufficiently reward this tight Coniunctio Oppositorum (as Jung called it), we scored 25/44. With the new algorithm, we score 37/44, which finally does justice to 55 years of my observations.

Other Interesting Comparisons (Old vs. New):

  • Sigmund Freud & Carl Jung: 32 → 24 (The new engine is more precise regarding orbs).

  • Ciro Discepolo & Luigi Galli: 33 → 53. (Our Moons are just 2 arc-minutes apart! An exceptional bond until his death).

  • John Lennon & Yoko Ono: 12 → 24.

  • Identical Twins (born same minute): 63 → 91 (The theoretical maximum).

This software is not meant to be the “word of God,” but a concrete, objective reference point for analyzing the quality of a bond.

Note: Event photos were kindly taken by the Valet.