Today is Princess Kate Middleton’s birthday (the real one, since she was born on 9/1/1982, at 12, not far from London). As far as we know, the beautiful princess is spending it in one of her London residences. Too bad, since she is breaking two important rules of the 34, but I see that every day, even people who say they are experts in Active Astrology, heavily violate the 34 rules and I can’t understand the logic behind their doing this. If Prince William’s beautiful wife had asked me for advice, I would have suggested she go to Punta Arenas, in the extreme south of the American continent, making Jupiter fall very close to the Ascendant, a position that often even resurrects the dead…
But so it is.
Note that in this case too, as I have written in several of my books, rule 34 also applies to the radix sky of a subject: here we have a very ugly sixth House of birth with, inside, above all Mars and Saturn, even if in wide conjunction. Does anyone think that this is unrelated to what has happened to you in recent months?
Master I saw your video on Giulia’s case but if I calculate the birth chart of Giulia Cecchettin May 5, 2001 at 12:12 in Vigonovo, it says that Neptune is in 6 not in 7
where is the mistake? Thanks
The mistake is that you try to interpret what I say or write, using alien astrology schools: in the one that concerns me, which has its roots, as in this specific case, in Judicial Astrology, reinforced by the discoveries of Michel and Françoise Gauquelin, the dominant “exits” the range of a House and follows the orbits indicated by Gauquelin and, therefore, a star is “at the Ascendant” or is “at the Medium Coeli”, or is “at the Descendant” or is “at the Imum Coeli”, even beyond 2.5 degrees of the cusp. It is “dominant”. To understand Astrology at a University level, you must first have studied the ABC: “New Guide to Astrology” in the chapter “The Dominant”.
So sorry Royals are so imprisoned in all those rules and protocols, and probably astrological protocols (?)… In reality, freedom to travel and decide of our lives is, among others, the real Wealth.
Best wishes to the Princess…
ear Ciro,
This post of yours inspires me with a question. We know from Gauquelin’s research and your studies (backed up by your direct experience) that a planet above the ascendant is dominant and very strong. I would like to ask you: between a Jupiter conjunct the ascendant, but in the first house, and a Jupiter conjunct the ascendant from the twelfth (less than two degrees away), can we quantify the difference in terms of power ? Can we say that Jupiter above the ascendant is at least ten times stronger (perhaps even more) than Jupiter in the first house conjoined to the ascendant?
I think it is very important for us readers to be confronted with such an exceptional reality, which is only a credit to your research!
Thank you
Yes, Margherita: we can say it and we have said it (I have said it, in many books).
Thank you, Ciro. Always masterful! And so encouraging and exciting!
With regard to this discourse on the Gauquelin zones, in particular if we place a planet (Jupiter, Sun, Venus, Pluto, Uranus) in the MC from the ninth, we therefore know that that planet is dominant. But I am afraid I have not understood correctly: as far as the ninth house is concerned (in which the planet conjoined to the MC is found), are the facts relating to it emphasised? That is, in addition to the advantages in terms of emancipation given by the presence of the planet in the Mk, the events relating to the ninth house (travel, studies, relationships with foreigners, etc.) are even more emphasised than when the planet is simply in the ninth, right?
Indeed, one might think that it is the sector of the ninth house that favours the attainment of the promises of the tenth of rs ? As you always say knowledge is the highest form of emancipation. Have I understood this correctly?
Thank you very much!
Dear Margherita,
I have explained this topic in detail in many of my books, starting with the 5 volumes of my blog where, very often over the years, some Readers have asked me the same question. If I remember correctly, in the preface of one of these 5 volumes I dedicated an entire chapter to this topic.