Select Page

An ugly page of history.

It is the one we all had to witness on worldwide television, from the Oval Office of the White House, a few days ago.

Personally, after watching various news programs, I was absolutely convinced that President Trump and his vice president J.D. Vance had organized a trap and a public lynching live from Washington. But I watched the entire film twice (49 minutes) of this small-big global tragedy and I didn’t miss a single second of it; I observed everything that happened with the utmost attention and I think that things are not like that because, objectively, President Trump was cordial, at the beginning of the chat, while President Zelensky was immediately aggressive and even offensive, several times. Of course, my political judgment, or even human judgment, on what happened is not important, but I wanted to clarify it because I started from a clearly opposite position.

Here I prefer to pass the word to the stars and leave my judgment as a man more aside.

Volodymyr Zelensky was born in Krivoj Rog, Ukraine (I pronounce Ucraìna and not Ukraina), on January 25, 1970, at 2:00 p.m. I believe that the time, net of the physiological rounding of a few minutes, is correct because it is classified as “A” on the Rodden scale, and because his history confirms it: he was an actor, in a professional sense, as both the Gemini Ascendant and three stars, including Jupiter, in the fifth House, well describe. Jupiter itself, cusp of the fifth/sixth House, brought him much success, even in politics. But his birth chart expresses two not insignificant stellar threats: a terrible triangle formed by the Sun, which is in quadrature with Jupiter and Saturn, and that position that I consider terrible, harmful, of Mars and Saturn in the same House, which for Solar Returns corresponds to my rule 34 and for birth charts is no less pernicious. In fact, the two malefics in the eleventh radix House mean or can also mean a “collapsing world consensus”. Forever.

Here I could not express myself differently: I believe that his political destiny is inescapably sealed.

In my opinion, reading these positions, together with the picture that the reading of his last Solar Return and his last Lunar Return offers us, we see, objectively, that he, net of his courage and his pain, as president of a people who defend themselves, has made a big mistake and on a diplomatic level his performance would deserve a 2 minus minus.

As I have already specified, however, it is not up to me to establish a historical judgment that will accompany him in the centuries to come, but the facts are facts and they speak to us exactly in the same direction as the stars.

Diplomacy is not an art, but an obligation that every politician who counts should pursue almost religiously.

And let’s see his RSM and his RLM that gave rise to such a personal and world tragedy.

In the chart you can see both his last Solar Return and his last Lunar Return, both in progress, and which marked this Caporetto.

Later I will explain how I can be almost certain that he was in Kiev, in both these returns.

The RS shows us a Mars in the tenth House and a stellium in the sixth House, that is a big violation of the 34 rules. Neptune on the cusp of the seventh was the special touch in this bad return, dazzling him, confusing him as much as possible in “a very important meeting”.

The Lunar Return was no exception and did the rest with a Mars in the twelfth House that according to some visually impaired astrologers “would make it grow” … The Sun and Mercury in the seventh and Uranus in the tenth completed the picture.

The transits?

Forget them. If some Sunday astrologer tells you that he has understood everything and that transits should be examined, then ask them to do as I did by publishing not hundreds, as I did, but at least 20/30 cases of dating of events relating to important and public figures and that can be explained by transits, outside of the RS+RL logic.

And the same goes for supporters of Sunday astrologers, especially those who believe that the ethics of each of us can be flexible, personal and not subject to dispute.

A bit like others who are also convinced that anyone with a good education can do self-analysis and not deep analysis (according to them, Freud and Jung were two amateurs in disarray).

Why am I convinced that Volodymyr Zelensky was in Kiev for both returns? I did some research, with the help of ChatGPT, but I didn’t stop at the latter’s statements and I “went to see”.

According to the most famous chatbot in existence today, President Zelensky was in Davon, Canton of Graubünden, Switzerland, between January 21 and 24, 2025, for the World Economic Forum.

This is confirmed by three official and authoritative documents, but above all by this page which indicates the precise calendar of Zelensky’s trips in recent years: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_international_presidential_trips_made_by_Volodymyr_Zelenskyy

To tell the truth, the Ukrainian president would have been there also at the time of the return, but I will explain why this is not the case.

His return took place at 22:32 in Kiev on January 24. Now we know for sure that he was in Kiev the next morning, January 25, because there he met with the President of Moldova, Maia Sandu. During this meeting, they discussed issues related to the energy crisis in Transnistria and other regional security issues.

Therefore, it is highly probable that Zelensky, who arrived in Davos on January 21 and not January 20, had already returned to Kiev on the evening of the 24th.

Regarding the February 13 RL, I don’t think there can be any doubt as we know that the President was in Kiev where he welcomed US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to discuss Ukraine’s resource potential and future economic partnerships.

 

Note: Some readers have pointed out to me that President Zelensky was born in 1978 and not 1970. I found this birth data online two years ago and it seemed reliable, but I will do some research to see if it is incorrect.